ml1 said:
yes, let's leave the insane options on the table too.
ml1 said:
nope, not gonna engage.
ajc said:
Here's an easy question, why take any options off the table?
TylerDurden said:
So we're just going to write off this Lindsey Buckingham idea?!?!?!
LOST said:
It is obvious that all options are always "on the table" or under the table or whatever, but talking about it is the problem.
I believe that would violate the Geneva Convention.TylerDurden said:
So we're just going to write off this Lindsey Buckingham idea?!?!?!
“It would be something more along the lines of what President Clinton did in December 1998 during Operation Desert Fox,” Cotton said. “Several days’ air and naval bombing against Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction facilities for exactly the same kind of behavior. For interfering with weapons inspectors and for disobeying Security Council resolutions.”Had Cotton been around back then, he'd have been accusing Clinton of wagging the dog. Now he's praising his actions.
ParticleMan said:
I believe that would violate the Geneva Convention.TylerDurden said:
So we're just going to write off this Lindsey Buckingham idea?!?!?!
Or a nice playlist1:TylerDurden said:
ParticleMan said:
I believe that would violate the Geneva Convention.TylerDurden said:
So we're just going to write off this Lindsey Buckingham idea?!?!?!
Maybe we can send them the Dee Dee Ramone Rap record.
bettyd said:
Cotton, Cheney, McCain and other assorted neocons are the same when it comes to war. It's going to be a walk in the park. We'll just use our strength and technology and it will be over before you know it. No fuss, no mess, no repercussions, no civilians will be hurt or killed. After the bombs are dropped and the destruction is caused, what could possibly go wrong.
Renovated apartment in Bloomfield
3 Bd | 2Full Ba
$2,850
LOST