rescueme said:
Newark will take the building its part of the deal.
Copihue said:
There is no doubt in my mind that hiring a subcontractor to round up loose animals in the Maplewood streets, housing them in a shelter for a week or two, and then killing them is less expensive than having an animal control officer catch the animal before it gets hit by a car, who catches the offending dog/cat and looks up the record to find its owner, or who knows who the habitual runaway is and calls the owner at work to come get him/her, who takes traps to locations where there is wildlife that is annoying humans and then releases the animals in the reservation, who immediately cleans up dead animals, so that you and your children don't have to look at the guts spilled all over the pavement as you take your children to the park or walk to catch the train instead of waiting for the county to come late in the week, who gives you the bad news that your baby just bit the dust, that all of this is more expensive than the cold and expedient killing machine. OK. But is that what we want?
This is not one less person at DPW, one less person at the library, it is the only person who performs these duties with the love of someone who lives in our community and who cares about animals who would be gone and the services for the most part would be gone too.
I believe that we need to find other solutions to the problem which was created by the JAC's negligence. There are other rescue organizations out there, can't we find one that can take over what the JAC was supposed to be doing?
rescueme said:
In 2014 the a c o pick up about 6 dogs five went into foster homes and one went to Newark. The administration knows this because every month Bob roe has to add up the animals that the a c o picks up including how many dead animals how many animals were tested for rabies were tickets given out how many cats were pick up even with those reports the administration is still siding it sounds to me someone is getting pay off.
rescueme said:
Ruth is holding on to the building she has it tied up in the courts I see it Maplewood a c o can run it along with south ORange so we can't take over the building . The building the town claims required a lot of work to it to run it as a shelter both town claims to already dump to much money in it they don't want to hear anymore about them paying they want to hear the making money on it instead
ctrzaska said:
rescueme said:
In 2014 the a c o pick up about 6 dogs five went into foster homes and one went to Newark. The administration knows this because every month Bob roe has to add up the animals that the a c o picks up including how many dead animals how many animals were tested for rabies were tickets given out how many cats were pick up even with those reports the administration is still siding it sounds to me someone is getting pay off.
rescueme said:
Ruth is holding on to the building she has it tied up in the courts I see it Maplewood a c o can run it along with south ORange so we can't take over the building . The building the town claims required a lot of work to it to run it as a shelter both town claims to already dump to much money in it they don't want to hear anymore about them paying they want to hear the making money on it instead
You're babbling in unintelligible run-on sentences and making no sense whatsoever. I'll ask again: what "deal"?
rescueme said:
Newark is covering Maplewood as of the first, they were told behind closed doors that once they get the j a c building it will go to them.
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
calliope