This paper has hated Fulop for years. Look for more sources. But meanwhile, Fulop had actual proposals for many of the problems we face in this state. Attempting to address problems is good. Instead we have an entirely negative campaign with no ideas from either candidate. And after the campaign our elected local officials will face all of the same problems.
Fulop has been in bed with developers in JC for many years, among other issues. I liked parts of his platform but I can't ignore his past.
https://www.jerseycitynj.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=6189744&pageId=21168043
This report is 4 months old, but I only learned of it today on NJN.
At the moment I'm frustrated by Sheena's honoring Bob Zuckerman at the SOPAC Gala.
He was one of the people against SOMA having a shelter.
As someone who is constantly called to rescue or TNR the pregnant cats and dying kittens born in SOMA's garages, it is a disgrace, particularly when South Orange and Maplewood are being publicized as the top 2 towns for registered Democrats in the state. At least numbers 4 and 5, Montclair and East Orange have shelters.
We employ the shameful Animal Control Solutions who has no shelter, refuses to disclose where they take animals that they pick up, yet services about 50 towns.
This is proof that no matter who you support or why someone will have a reason to oppose them. I supported Fulop mainly because I thought he would take NJ transit issues and municipal consolidation seriously. I don't know what his position was on animal shelters.
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.

Recently I’ve listened to a few stories from the Jersey City Times. They’re well written, balanced, and reasonably in depth.
https://law.yale.edu/mfia/projects/newsgathering/jersey-city-times-0
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/documents/pdf/MFIA%20Jersey%20City%20Times%20Complaint.pdf