Twitter is a Private Company
paulsurovell said:
If I understand this, it will make Twitter more competitive with MOL
So Elon paid $44 Billion to turn the Twitter into Blogger.
nohero said:
paulsurovell said:
If I understand this, it will make Twitter more competitive with MOL
So Elon paid $44 Billion to turn the Twitter into Blogger.
Up next, elaborate ascii signature files for everyone!
Elon says "Comedy is back" on the twitter, but he doesn't understand what comedy is.
Elon Musk right now is like if Elmer Fudd bought a website of Bugs Bunnies
— Ken(neth) (@disasterlaster) November 6, 2022
nohero said:
paulsurovell said:
nohero said:
ml1 said:
paulsurovell said:
Great thread (trending):
https://twitter.com/search?q=%22Go%20Elon%22&src=trend_click&vertical=trends
clicking that link was the biggest waste of time of my week.
I disagree. It reveals a lot about Paul. Examples -
Are you staying on Twitter?
What's it to you?
I'll miss you if you leave.
paulsurovell said:
nohero said:
paulsurovell said:
Are you staying on Twitter?
What's it to you?
I'll miss you if you leave.
You could just unblock me, instead of "stalking", as you like to inaccurately call it.
[Edited to add] Of course, if you unblocked me, I might point out facts which you get uncomfortable with, as before when you previously blocked me.
Meanwhile, back at the new unbiased Twitter -
VOTE REPUBLICAN! https://t.co/3KbjZYMPvu
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) November 7, 2022
nohero said:
Meanwhile, back at the new unbiased Twitter -
excesses of Democratic Party -- spending on infrastructure, working people
excesses of Republican Party -- undermining confidence in elections, insurrection.
Yup, seems about the same to me 
nohero said:
Meanwhile, back at the new unbiased Twitter -
Does this mean you believe MOL is also not unbiased b/c its proprietor(s) express their own political views?
Smedley said:
Does this mean you believe MOL is also biased b/c its proprietor(s) express their own political views?
No.
And if you misunderstood that I was commenting on Mr. Musk's claims, then I apologize if that was unclear to you.
Well it seemed to me like you were suggesting Twitter is not unbiased, b/c Musk offers political commentary.
Your "clarification" about what you were suggesting, if anything, is about as clear as mud. But, carry on.
Smedley said:
Well it seemed to me like you were suggesting Twitter is not unbiased, b/c Musk offers political commentary.
Your "clarification" about what you were suggesting, if anything, is about as clear as mud. But, carry on.
Thanks for your clarification, it was as helpful as always.
As W.C. Fields said, If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.
Smedley said:
As W.C. Fields said, If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS.
fwiw, it was perfectly clear to me.
Okay, so nh wasn't suggesting Twitter is not unbiased bc Musk talks politics.
That means he was suggesting Twitter is not unbiased bc a Republican representative tweeted "vote Republican"?
That strikes me as the only other option.
Smedley said:
Okay, so nh wasn't suggesting Twitter is not unbiased bc Musk talks politics.
That means he was suggesting Twitter is not unbiased bc a Republican representative tweeted "vote Republican"?
That strikes me as the only other option.
think harder.
I still think my first interpretation of the cryptic nohero post is correct, but even nh realized his premise was idiotic so rather than defend it he fired up the smoke machine.
I'll leave you guys to your riddles.
Smedley said:
I still think my first interpretation of the cryptic nohero post is correct, but even nh realized his premise was idiotic so rather than defend it he fired up the smoke machine.
I'll leave you guys to your riddles.
Amazing...this guy occasionally actually makes sense, then ^^^^^
Smedley said:
Well it seemed to me like you were suggesting Twitter is not unbiased, b/c Musk offers political commentary.
Your "clarification" about what you were suggesting, if anything, is about as clear as mud. But, carry on.
It's called obfuscation.
paulsurovell said:
Smedley said:
Well it seemed to me like you were suggesting Twitter is not unbiased, b/c Musk offers political commentary.
Your "clarification" about what you were suggesting, if anything, is about as clear as mud. But, carry on.
It's called obfuscation.
For Twitter to deserve public trust, it must be politically neutral, which effectively means upsetting the far right and the far left equally
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 27, 2022
Smedley said:
I still think my first interpretation of the cryptic nohero post is correct, but even nh realized his premise was idiotic so rather than defend it he fired up the smoke machine.
I'll leave you guys to your riddles.
You'd be more on target if almost the entire world used MOL. I think that's clear enough. But that's just my opinion.
dave said:
You'd be more on target if almost the entire world used MOL. I think that's clear enough. But that's just my opinion.
MOL: New Jersey, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong.
ridski said:
MOL: New Jersey, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong.
”The sun never sets on MOL.”
nohero said:
”The sun never sets on MOL.”
Need to get at least one more point I think:
https://shademap.app/@6.29227,162.10111,2z,1668077198315t,0b,0p,0m
PVW said:
nohero said:
”The sun never sets on MOL.”
Need to get at least one more point I think:
https://shademap.app/@6.29227,162.10111,2z,1668077198315t,0b,0p,0m
Did you include Moscow into that estimation?
Sponsored Business
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
What's it to you?