cupoftea said:
I was just thinking the other day how it had been awhile since a truck had gotten stuck under a bridge. I hope the trucking companies get billed for the support services needed and any damage to the bridge!
spqr said:
The conductor on the 8:30 from Maplewood told me the trains are just moving slowly through that area...didn't seem like any significant delay.
I don't see how there would be an alternative, but I think that is a highly unlikely scenario.composerjohn said:
Purely as a hypothetical - what would happen if the truck damaged the bridge badly and it couldn't be used? Would all train service just stop? I guess so!
marcsiry said:
A truck trailer is basically a hollow aluminum box. I can't see it doing anything other than superficial, cosmetic damage to a stone bridge designed to support dozens of multi-ton trains barreling over it ever day.
You'd have to run an M1 tank into one of the supports for it to be a hazard to anything other than local street traffic, if think.
plungy