I hope this is pursued. For years I've thought that Irvington doesn't need to exist. It should be divided up among all of the bordering towns. I think that's Newark, Hillside, Union, and Maplewood. Am I wrong?
DanDietrich said:
I hope this is pursued. For years I've thought that Irvington doesn't need to exist. It should be divided up among all of the bordering towns. I think that's Newark, Hillside, Union, and Maplewood. Am I wrong?
it’s more than twice the size of Maplewood. Why do you feel this way?
DanDietrich said:
I hope this is pursued. For years I've thought that Irvington doesn't need to exist. It should be divided up among all of the bordering towns. I think that's Newark, Hillside, Union, and Maplewood. Am I wrong?
What you propose is not a solution. Strong fiscal monitoring by the State or other responsible body would be a much more direct solution.
mrincredible said:
DanDietrich said:
I hope this is pursued. For years I've thought that Irvington doesn't need to exist. It should be divided up among all of the bordering towns. I think that's Newark, Hillside, Union, and Maplewood. Am I wrong?
it’s more than twice the size of Maplewood. Why do you feel this way?
Given DanDietrich’s long history of posts, I’d be willing to bet he doesn’t.
I do feel that way. We have too many governments and school districts in NJ. That town seems to have endless administrative problems. Please note, I suggest dividing it among the four adjacent towns. It doesn't matter that it's twice the size of Maplewood. Maybe Maplewood only takes 15% or something, depending on where the natural breaks would be. I know it will never happen, though, because everyone thinks about consolidation only in terms of similar or wealthier towns.
DanDietrich said:
I do feel that way.
I’m sorry for being presumptuous.
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.

dickf3