I didn't conference call, but in my case the doctor's office told the same LIE to me and to the insurance company, that they had submitted the bill immediately. The insurance company had no record of a timely filing but said that if they produced their voucher (proof of submitting a bill) then they would agree to pay the bill. The doctor's office couldn't explain to me or the insurance company why they didn't have a voucher.suzyc said:
I have found that if you get both the billing department and the insurance company on a conference call with you that you can resolve these issues quickly. I have been through this too many times to count. It's the only thing that I have found that resolves the billing issues.
I am worried about this with my youngest since he was born on my husband's birthday. His name is different, but his date of birth is the same except for the year, and when you use the two digit year (15)rather than the full four digit year (2015), then the only difference between their dates of birth is ONE digit. That is a screw up waiting to happen.pmartinezv said:
When my son was first born, claims regarding his birth kept getting denied because he has the same name as his father. His father was on my insurance for a little while and then he was removed, so the insurance kept replying to the hospital that the individual was not covered. We had to make multiple calls and have my HR department explain that this was a newborn and to pay attention to the birth date to differentiate the individuals. It was eventually resolved, but I feel your pain or having to go through this nonsense when your hands are already more than full!!
spontaneous said:
I am worried about this with my youngest since he was born on my husband's birthday. His name is different, but his date of birth is the same except for the year, and when you use the two digit year (15)rather than the full four digit year (2015), then the only difference between their dates of birth is ONE digit. That is a screw up waiting to happen.pmartinezv said:
When my son was first born, claims regarding his birth kept getting denied because he has the same name as his father. His father was on my insurance for a little while and then he was removed, so the insurance kept replying to the hospital that the individual was not covered. We had to make multiple calls and have my HR department explain that this was a newborn and to pay attention to the birth date to differentiate the individuals. It was eventually resolved, but I feel your pain or having to go through this nonsense when your hands are already more than full!!
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
In the fall, I got a bill from the hospital for his birth. It had originally been paid by my insurance, and then once the coordination of benefits was established and mine was secondary, they reversed the charge (or something). So, my husband's insurance needed to be billed. Fine, easy... right?
I have gotten no fewer than 4 letters from the hospital since that time, saying that I owe about $4k because insurance didn't pay. But every time I log on to my husband's insurer site, I see no record of the claim being submitted at all. So I've diligently called every time, they have noted that I've called and said they would bill Aetna... and they still haven't. They've had issues submitting electronically, or something. Who knows - but this has been going on for at least 4 months. Last week I got a "final notice, this is going to collections" letter, so I called AGAIN, and was told this time a supervisor was going to physically walk the claim over so it gets submitted.
I logged on to Aetna today, and saw that the claim is finally there- with a denial code that says "You do not have to pay this charge. That is because the provider did not send the claim to us within the required time limit."
Sorry, hospital... I really, really tried!!! SMH.